Hikaya as a literary genre (based on A. Eniki's literary works of the 1940s–1960s)

V.R. Amineva

Kazan Federal University, Kazan, 420008 Russia

E-mail: amineva1000@list.ru

Received October 6, 2016

Full text PDF

Abstract

The paper discusses the peculiarities of functioning of hikaya as an art form in A. Eniki's prose during the 1940s–1960s. The relevance of the research is determined by the uncertainty of the concepts used for designation of works of average and small forms of epics in the Tatar literature of the 20th century. The analysis has been performed in order to identify the genre characteristics of hikaya as the non-canonical genre of Tatar Literature, which is not identical to the non-canonical small epic genres (e.g., stories) in Russian and European literature. Furthermore, it has been established that hikaya is not identical to novella on the one hand and narrative on the other hand. Systemic structural analysis, synchronic and diachronic approaches to investigation of the material have been used to achieve the above-stated goal.

On the basis of the study the following conclusions have been made: the specifics of hikaya genre in A. Eniki's works define the correlation of epic and lyrical categories in the structure of the work. Depending on this correlation, the following typological varieties of the genre have been singled out: lyrical hikaya (neser), lyro-epic hikaya, and epic hikaya. Most of A. Eniki's hikayas considered in this paper are lyro-epic works dominated by the equivalence of epic and lyrical structures. The narration is, as a rule, focused on one character and one event of their personal life which causes fundamental changes in their thinking, attitude, and world perception. The distinctive feature of poetics is a particular type of subjective architectonics (the story is narrated on behalf of the character, who is similar to a lyrical subject, or such a method of creating the sphere of the character is used as substituted direct speech, in which the proximity of the character to the author is emphasized).

In the epic hikayas, a strong dramatic trend is manifested, but the dramatic elements are subordinated to the author's setting for the objectification of what is represented and contributed to the actual epic features of the genre. The internal measure of the hikaya genre is the interaction between des­criptive and narrative components in a diverse variation of their proportions. The ratio between narrative and des­criptive components in A. Eniki's prose has been established. The obtained results are important for the historical poetics of the hikaya genre in Tatar literature, for understanding the genre distinction in A. Eniki's works of the 1940s-1960s and in Tatar literature of this period on the whole.

Keywords: A. Eniki, Tatar literature of 20th century, genre, hikaya, story, tale, short story, lyrics, epos, drama, narration, des­cription

Acknowledgments. This study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and the Government of the Republic of Tatarstan (project no. 17-14-16004 a(r)).

References

  1. Zagidullina D.F. Literary Laws and Time: Occurrence and Development Stages of Literary Theory in Tatars. Kazan, Tatar. Kn. Izd., 2000. 271 p. (In Tatar)
  2. Zagidullina D.F. Tatar Encyclopedia. Vol. 6. Khikaya [Hikaya]. Khasanov M.Kh. (Ed.). Kazan, Inst. Tatar. Entsikl., 2014, pp. 215–217. (In Russian)
  3. Gaifieva G.R. The poetics of story genre in the Tatar prose of the late 20th – early 21st centuries. Extended Abstract of Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Kazan, 2010. 24 p. (In Russian)
  4. Ninov A. Brief Literary Encyclopedia. Vol. 6. Rasskaz [Story]. Surkov A.A. (Ed.). Moscow, Sov. Entsikl., 1971, col. 190–193. (In Russian)
  5. Pospelov G.N. Literary Encyclopedic Dictionary. Rasskaz [Story]. Kozhevnikov V.M., Nikolaev P.A. (Eds.). Moscow, Sov. Entsikl., 1987, p. 318. (In Russian)
  6. Darvin M.N., Magomedova D.M., Tamarchenko N.D., Tyupa V.I. The Theory of Literary Genres. Moscow, Akademiya, 2011. 256 p. (In Russian)
  7. Skobelev V.P. Story Poetics. Voronezh, Izd. Voronezh. Univ., 1982. 155 p. (In Russian)
  8. Loks K. Literary Encyclopedia. Dictionary of Literary Terms. 2 Vols. Rasskaz [Story]. Moscow, Leningrad, L.D. Frenkel', 1925, vol. 2, col. 693–695. (In Russian)
  9. Kozhinov V. Dictionary of Literary Terms. Rasskaz [Story]. Timofeev S.V., Turaev S.V. (Eds.). Moscow, Prosveshchenie, 1974, pp. 309–310. (In Russian)
  10. Tamarchenko N.D. Theoretical Poetics: Concepts and Definitions: Chrestomathy. Moscow, RGGU, 2002. 467 p. (In Russian)
  11. Rekhim G. Insight in folk literature. An, 1914, no. 14, pp. 14–22. (In Tatar)
  12. Isanbet Yu.N. Folk Song. Problems of Research. Dve osnovnye formy tatarskoi narodnoi pesni [Two Main Forms of Tatar Folk Song]. Leningrad, Leningr. Gos. Inst. Teatra, Musyki, Kinematogr., 1983, p. 57–69. (In Russian)
  13. Nigmedzyanov M.N. Folk Songs of Volga Tatars. Moscow, Sov. Kompositor, 1982. 136 p. (In Russian)
  14. Tabaeva A.A. To the study of plangent song of Kazan Tatars. Vestnik  Kazanskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta Kul'tury i Iskusstv, 2013, no. 2, pp. 50–54. (In Russian)
  15. Abdullin A.Kh. Problems of Tatar Music. Tematika i zhanry tatarskoi dorevolyutsionnoi pesni [Themes and Genres of Tatar Pre-Revolutionary Song]. Girshman Ya.M. (Ed.). Kazan, Kazan. Gos. Konservatoriya, 1967. pp. 3–80. (In Russian)
  16. Zagidullina D.F. Modernism in the Tatar Literature of the First Third of the 20th Century. Kazan, Tatar. Kn. Izd., 2013. 207 p. (In Russian)
  17. Karamova A.Z. Psychologism in Amirkhan Eniki's works. Extended Abstract of Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Kazan, 2005. 20 p. (In Russian)
  18. Motigullina A.R. The qualities of principle characters in Amirkhan Eniki's prose. Extended Abstract of Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Kazan, 2000. 22 p. (In Russian)
  19. Ibatullina D.E. Poetics of Amirkhan Eniki's prose. Extended Abstract of Cand. Philol. Sci. Diss. Kazan, 1993. 21 p. (In Russian)
  20. Zagidullina D.F. Tatar Literature of 1960–1980: Innovative Searchers and Experiments. Kazan, Tatar. Kn. Izd., 2015. 383 p. (In Tatar)
  21. Tyupa V.I. Discourse. Genre. Moscow, Intrada, 2013. 211 p. (In Russian)
  22. Gainullina G.R. Discourse analysis of A. Eniki's story “Tugan Tufrak” (“Native Land”). Philology and Culture, 2013, no. 3, pp. 177–180. (In Russian)
  23. Bakhtin M.M. Tetralogy. Moscow, Labirint, 1998. 607 p. (In Russian)
  24. Poetics: Dictionary of Actual Terms and Concepts. Tamarchenko N.D. (Ed.). Moscow, Izd. Kulaginoi: Intrada, 2008. 357 p. (In Russian)
  25. Rymar' N.M. Lyric Story: Creative Tasks and Poetics. Samara, Izd. Samar. Univ., 2008. 79 p. (In Russian)
  26. Hansen-Löve A.A. Der russische Symbolismus. System und Entfaltung der poetischen Motive. Mythopoetischer Symbolismus. Kosmische Symbolik. Wien, Verlag Oesterr. Akad. Wiss., 2003. 814 S. (In German)
  27. Braginskii V.I. Sufism in the Context of Islamic Culture. Simvolism sufiiskogo puti v “Poeme o more zhenshchin” i motiv svadebnogo korablya [Symbolism of the Sufi Pathway in the Poem about the Sea of Women and the Motif of Wedding Ship]. Moscow, Nauka, 1989, pp. 174–215. (In Russian)
  28. Schimmel A. Mystical Dimensions of Islam. The Univ. of N. C. Press, 1975. 512 p.
  29. Gachev G.D. National World Images. Central Asia: Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan. Islamic Space (Intellectual Travels). Moscow, Izd. Serv., 2002. 781 p. (In Russian)
  30. Khatipov F.M., Sverigin R.Kh. Amirkhan Eniki: Life and Creative Development of the Writer: Monograph. Kazan, TGGPU, 2009. 114 p. (In Tatar)
  31. Amineva V.R. Types of Dialogical Relations between National Literatures (Based on the Material from the Works of Russian Writers in the Second Half of the 19th Century and Tatar Prose Writers in the First Third of the 20th Century). Kazan, Kazan. Gos. Univ., 2010. 474 p. (In Russian)
  32. Ganieva R.K. Tatar Literature: Traditions, Interrelations. Kazan, Izd. Kazan. Univ., 2002. 268 p. (In Russian)
  33. Kurbanmamadov A. The Aesthetic Doctrine of Sufism: Experience of Critical Analysis. Dushanbe, Donish, 1987. 108 p. (In Russian)
  34. Zagidullina D.F., Ibragimov M.I., Amineva V.R. Basics of Literary Work Analysis. Kazan, Magarif, 2005. 111 p. (In Tatar)

For citation: Amineva V.R. Hikaya as a Literary Genre (Based on A. Eniki's Literary Works of the 1940s–1960s). Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye Nauki, 2017, vol. 159, no. 1, pp. 7–25. (In Russian)


The content is available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.